Current:Home > ScamsWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -WealthFlow Academy
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
View
Date:2025-04-17 15:45:57
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@usatoday.com and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (78)
Related
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- The fate of America's largest lithium mine is in a federal judge's hands
- UFC Fighter Conor McGregor Denies Sexually Assaulting Woman at NBA Game
- Young Voters, Motivated by Climate Change and Environmental Justice, Helped Propel Biden’s Campaign
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Tesla's stock lost over $700 billion in value. Elon Musk's Twitter deal didn't help
- Bidding a fond farewell to Eastbay, the sneakerhead's catalogue
- January is often a big month for layoffs. Here's what to do in a worst case scenario
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Fighting Attacks on Inconvenient Science—and Scientists
Ranking
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- Rebel Wilson Shares Glimpse Into Motherhood With “Most Adorable” Daughter Royce
- Modest Swimwear Picks for the Family Vacay That You'll Actually Want to Wear
- Vanderpump Rules' Tom Sandoval Defends His T-Shirt Sex Comment Aimed at Ex Ariana Madix
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Clean Energy Loses Out in Congress’s Last-Minute Budget Deal
- Inside Clean Energy: Tesla Gets Ever So Close to 400 Miles of Range
- Judge drops sexual assault charges against California doctor and his girlfriend
Recommendation
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
Biden signs a bill to fight expensive prison phone call costs
Read Ryan Reynolds' Subtle Shout-Out to His and Blake Lively's 4th Baby
How Olivia Wilde Is Subtly Supporting Harry Styles 7 Months After Breakup
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
Cross-State Air Pollution Causes Significant Premature Deaths in the U.S.
In Afghanistan, coal mining relies on the labor of children